The Court of Cassation. sect. Lav, in its ruling of 14.05.2009, No 11206 radically changes its consolidated guidance on calculating the period of training and work for periodic salary increases.
In particular, the Supreme Court ruled that "There is at odds with the peremptory norm collective agreement that, in regulating the periodic wage increases, excluding the profit calculation of the period of training and work, not denying, the provision in question, length of service established by law, but merely to provide a cut pay for employees whose contribution to productivity has been reduced because of the specificity of the relationship training and work (the dispute concerned the agreement interconfederal December 18, 1998 and the National Collective Bargaining Agreement for employees of the national railways July 7, 1995)
Dr. Giangiacomo Magni
