The Supreme Court on Via Rasella: partisans, not" murderers "
ROME - You can not define" murderers ", nor" massacre of civilians, "the partisans of Via Rasella. They are" harming the dignity and claims of 'honor recipients, "wrote the Supreme Court, ruling that the 16,916 come back to this' attack on March 23, 1944 against the German SS battalion Bozen. The dispute began several years ago, after a ruling by the Supreme Court qualified the 'attack' legitimate act of war. " In that 'Time at the gappisti accused of being "murderers of civilians." Bentivegna Elena (daughter of Rosario and Carla Capponi, medal 'gold for the Resistance, who died in 2000) sued the newspaper for moral damages, but both first and second instance the claim was rejected: in 2004 court 's Appeal ruled that the offending term must be understood as "the synthesis of a legitimate historical negative feedback." Not so, argues, however, the Supreme Court, because the word "murderers" evokes only concept massacre by massacre, to slaughter. " And 'the further specification of the massacre of civilians were addressed issues not assume nor unequivocal on the point of metaphorical evocation not of immediate negative historical judgments, but damaging to the dignity and claims of' honor of the recipients. " Therefore, the reasoning of the court 's appeal to "breaking on' unambiguous meaning of the term used, and lie by omission" where they do not evaluate the 'match between the words "murderers" and "civilized", which produces' the clear effect of combining the 'act of war carried out by the partisans to' slaughter of unarmed countrymen. " Now the case will return to court 's call for the calculation of damages. But this is not the point. "For the hundredth time the historical truth was confirmed, and then someone will start to believe it, "says Rosario Bentivegna, 87. Also for the ruling PDCI is a milestone: 'D' now - says Alex Pignatiello - Going to make vulgar revisionism will not matter how laid down by the Supreme Court. " Alex D 'Amato, Pd adviser to the Lazio Region, rejoices in a verdict that "finally makes honor to the story." Lavinia Lavinia Di Gianvito
Di Gianvito
Page 20 (July 23, 2009) - Corriere della Sera
ROME - You can not define" murderers ", nor" massacre of civilians, "the partisans of Via Rasella. They are" harming the dignity and claims of 'honor recipients, "wrote the Supreme Court, ruling that the 16,916 come back to this' attack on March 23, 1944 against the German SS battalion Bozen. The dispute began several years ago, after a ruling by the Supreme Court qualified the 'attack' legitimate act of war. " In that 'Time at the gappisti accused of being "murderers of civilians." Bentivegna Elena (daughter of Rosario and Carla Capponi, medal 'gold for the Resistance, who died in 2000) sued the newspaper for moral damages, but both first and second instance the claim was rejected: in 2004 court 's Appeal ruled that the offending term must be understood as "the synthesis of a legitimate historical negative feedback." Not so, argues, however, the Supreme Court, because the word "murderers" evokes only concept massacre by massacre, to slaughter. " And 'the further specification of the massacre of civilians were addressed issues not assume nor unequivocal on the point of metaphorical evocation not of immediate negative historical judgments, but damaging to the dignity and claims of' honor of the recipients. " Therefore, the reasoning of the court 's appeal to "breaking on' unambiguous meaning of the term used, and lie by omission" where they do not evaluate the 'match between the words "murderers" and "civilized", which produces' the clear effect of combining the 'act of war carried out by the partisans to' slaughter of unarmed countrymen. " Now the case will return to court 's call for the calculation of damages. But this is not the point. "For the hundredth time the historical truth was confirmed, and then someone will start to believe it, "says Rosario Bentivegna, 87. Also for the ruling PDCI is a milestone: 'D' now - says Alex Pignatiello - Going to make vulgar revisionism will not matter how laid down by the Supreme Court. " Alex D 'Amato, Pd adviser to the Lazio Region, rejoices in a verdict that "finally makes honor to the story." Lavinia Lavinia Di Gianvito
Di Gianvito
Page 20 (July 23, 2009) - Corriere della Sera
